You can do the following
my %b is BagHash = …

## Advertising

or
my %b := bag …
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Vittore Scolari
<vittore.scol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I answer myself: with % you get an Hash
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Vittore Scolari <vittore.scol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't here be better to use the % sigil?
>>
>> my %docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Fernando Santagata
>> <nando.santag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that I've understood what you need.
>>> If you get that array of arrays from a another process @rows and you wish
>>> to convert it into a Bag you can do this:
>>>
>>> my @rows = [["JF", 1], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2],
>>> ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["FV", 2], ["FV",
>>> 2], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2],
>>> ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JF", 4]];
>>> my Bag $docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
>>> dd $docents;
>>>
>>> # Bag $docents = ("JP"=>8,"FV"=>8,"FE"=>4,"MPu"=>8,"MM"=>8,"JF"=>9).Bag
>>>
>>> Otherwise you can start collecting those pairs into a Bag from the start,
>>> but we would need more details then.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:10 PM, mimosinnet <mimosin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I do not seem to be able to get this done with the Bag or BagHash type:
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> dd @rows;
>>>>
>>>>> Output: Array @rows = [["JF", 1], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2],
>>>>> ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["FV",
>>>>> 2], ["FV", 2], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2],
>>>>> ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JF", 4]]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> my %docents;
>>>> for @rows -> @row {
>>>> %docents{ @row[0] } += @row[1];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> dd %docents;
>>>>
>>>>> Output: Hash %docents = {:FE(4), :FV(8), :JF(9), :JP(8), :MM(8),
>>>>> :MPu(8)}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> As I understand it, this would better be achieved with the Bag or
>>>> BagHash type. What would be the easy way?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> --
>>>> (≧∇≦) Mimosinnet (Linux User: #463211)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fernando Santagata
>>
>>
>