On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Peter Haworth wrote: > Having the iteration done in the bytecode could make this simpler, > although at the expense of needing more bytecode.
And fewer temporaries, by translating this:
@a = @b ^+ @c ^+ @d;
into this:
for @a; @b; @c ; @d -> $a, $b, $c, $d is rw {
$d = $a + $b + $c;
}
/s
