On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:00:58PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > Seems to me that if T:H is passed a test file, it's not unreasonable for > it to expect at least one test.
No, not unreasonable. But I think it's also not unreasonable to reserve empty file to mean "no tests yet, ignore". > How about if T:I created a dummy test in the absence of any others? The problem is it adds noise to the output. I would rather skip empty files myself (in my build script) than see this noise, so T::I creating a non-empty file would be even worse for me. Andrew
