> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:00:58PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > > Seems to me that if T:H is passed a test file, it's not unreasonable for > > it to expect at least one test. > > No, not unreasonable. But I think it's also not unreasonable to reserve > empty file to mean "no tests yet, ignore". >
Couldn't an empty file indicate the inability for the installation process to write a file, which should be a failure case, and certainly one that needs to be caught? ok(1); Should be sufficient, and certainly not difficult? http://danconia.org
