Wow.  I'm impressed you got anywhere near this far! Your work sounds
very promising, a great way to validate Parrot's value proposition.

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
| And there is of course the question, if we should really be 
| "bug"-compatible
| 
| >>> False=42
| >>> if False:
| ...     print "aha", False
| ...
| aha 42

But that's not a bug.  If one assignes "42" to False, then this is what
False means, 42, nothing more and nothing less. Yes, I know you know this.

If you could, would you set your goal slightly higher than
just the Python tests?  I'd love to see Parrot do Stackless Python!

*bings*

Clark

Reply via email to