Wow. I'm impressed you got anywhere near this far! Your work sounds very promising, a great way to validate Parrot's value proposition.
Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
| | >>> False=42
But that's not a bug. If one assignes "42" to False, then this is what False means, 42, nothing more and nothing less. Yes, I know you know this.
Well. There are (AFAIK) only 2 instances of the bool object, these shouldn't be assignable. I think that doing "(True,False) = (0,1)" and then importing some library would break things horribly.
If you could, would you set your goal slightly higher than just the Python tests? I'd love to see Parrot do Stackless Python!
What I know of stackless isn't too much. But Parrot is using CPS (continuation passing style) for all subroutine and method calls, including coroutines aka generators. So I think that *is* stackless Python.
*bings*
Clark
leo
