wow, my code is being used in a flame war! *blush* :-)
Sorry! I didn't want this to come across as a flame. I just wanted to
make sure I (and other people ;) have the distinction between TAP and
uses of TAP clear in their minds. The sooner we can agree over what the
protocol should call "got" and "expected", the sooner we can write a TAP
harness that conveys that meaning to the end-user in whatever language
they prefer. :)
To summarize. What TAP uses is irrelevant, as long as it works. What
the Harness prints is relevant, but easy to fix any time. No worries
about TAP 1.0 vs. TAP 1.1, just download the new Test:Harness from CPAN
and everything will work. Right?
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
