I forgot to Cc: the list. Also, I've taken this ticket and will apply NotFound's patch in a day or so if we don't hear objections.
Pm On Mon May 12 10:08:19 2008, pmichaud wrote: > On Mon May 12 09:23:49 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The easier solution is to redefine string_bool to allow a NULL > > argument and return false in that case. Many places in the code does > > that check before the call, so this change will simplify it. > > +1 from me. I'd even give this +2 if I could. > > Notably, many of the functions in src/string.c check for NULL values > prior to performing a function (e.g., string_equal, string_concat, etc.) > so it makes very good sense to me for string_bool to do the same. > > Pm
