On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:40 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fixed a few similar problems with the optimized build. Is r27069 any > guidance? r23771 looks like it might affect this function as well. string_bool signature was modified in 23771, but was marked as not null anyway. But the perldoc item was, and still is: A string is true if it is equal to anything other than C<0>, C<""> or C<"0">. Implying that 0, that is, NULL, is acceptable. Regarding 27069, the problem here is not the same, the JIT compiler can not verify the signature, and thus can't give any warning. -- Salu2
