On Fri Feb 26 21:02:28 2010, pmichaud wrote: > Now fixed in 4ab4b8. Now reports: > > > &foo > Could not find non-existent sub &foo > > Unlike the previous error message, this is a runtime error (that occurs > when the program attempts to access &foo and cannot find one).
It's still quite distinct from what alpha did, namely to return a Failure when it didn't find a subroutine. $ alpha -e 'say &foo.WHAT' Failure() Which behaviour is the correct one? Is this spec'd?
