On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 02:38:29AM -0800, Carl Mäsak via RT wrote: > > Unlike the previous error message, this is a runtime error (that occurs > > when the program attempts to access &foo and cannot find one). > > It's still quite distinct from what alpha did, namely to return a Failure > when it didn't find a subroutine. > > $ alpha -e 'say &foo.WHAT' > Failure() > > Which behaviour is the correct one? Is this spec'd?
I'm not sure the desired behavior is spec'd yet. When it is, we can update rakudo to match. :-) Pm
