Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There may be scope for having two levels of API. One high level clean > simple etc and the other a lower-level more performance oriented API. > The former could be implemented in terms of the latter. This is essentially what I meant by: inline i_foo() { BLA; } ... foo() { i_foo(); } -John
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Andy Wardley
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Graham Barr
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Andy Dougherty
- Re: inline mania Tim Bunce
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- XS shortcomings (was Re: inline mania) John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Sam Tregar
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Simon Cozens
- Forging ahead alone (or "I can rewrite perl mys... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Forging ahead alone (or "I can rewrite perl... John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Simon Cozens