On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 08:22:28AM -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: > One thing: remember, there is a lot of talk about having > perl6 use Unicode internally, which means that things like > method names should be wchar_t * (or whatever). No, that's the beauty of utf8: the C datatype is still char* and as long as you stick to 7-bits ASCII you won't know the difference. wchar_t comes from a totally different school of thought, where all your strings are instantly incompatible and take twice or four times the memory. Larry knew what he was doing when he decided on utf8. -- The idea is that the first face shown to people is one they can readily accept - a more traditional logo. The lunacy element is only revealed subsequently, via the LunaDude. [excerpted from the Lunatech Identity Manual]
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Larry Wall
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Ken Fox
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class"... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Benjamin Stuhl
- Char encoding Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Char encoding Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Char encoding Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Char encoding Dan Sugalski
- Re: Char encoding Simon Cozens
- Re: Char encoding Dan Sugalski
- Re: Char encoding Simon Cozens