On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >One thing: remember, there is a lot of talk about having > >perl6 use Unicode internally, which means that things like > >method names should be wchar_t * (or whatever). > > Good point. I shall have to think Unicode more. (UTF-32, anyone? :) Though Not necessary, but we should not rule it out. I think UTF16 internally is the way to go. > it does present a problem for those languages that don't do Unicode and do > char* instead. I would guess we'd have to convert everything into Unicode. -- 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Larry Wall
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Ken Fox
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base cl... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class"... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Benjamin Stuhl
- Char encoding Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Char encoding Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Char encoding Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Char encoding Dan Sugalski
- Re: Char encoding Simon Cozens