At 09:25 AM 8/6/00 -0400, Ken Fox wrote: >John Tobey wrote: > > But if we anticipate possibly implementing mark-and-sweep > >We're definitely going to have some sort of traversing collector. It >might only augment the ref count collector. I'd rather not have multiple GC schemes going at once. (Though we may need some sort of "refered to by" field to track variables that have had references to them taken, so we know when the last referent goes out of scope) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Brock
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... John Tobey
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in per... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV e... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for ... Larry Wall