Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl

[Dan Sugalski]

At 03:29 AM 8/4/00 -0400, Ken Fox wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Your extended way's cool too--RFC it and we can do that as well.
>
>I've been wanting to. It would be nice (at least for me) for you to
>start suggesting more RFC "assignments" like this. Community is not
>the same as "no ownership" and there are a lot of people that have
>a lot more ownership of internals than me.

At this point nobody really has ownership of the internals, and suggestions 
and RFCs are always welcome, on any on-topic subject. I'm not going to get 
grumpy if someone submits an RFC on a piece of the guts that I have other 
thoughts about, or feel any sort of ownership over.

I've been a bit hesitant to go too far in starting things up until the 
language folks get situated, but I think that worry's a bit unfounded, at 
least for a good chunk of the core. I'll see about getting more prods out 
there, and starting up some sub-lists, to get more of the safe stuf spec'd out.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk