Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc.

[Nick Ing-Simmons]

Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>DS> I was thinking of that--the int portion has the number of keys/entries for 
>DS> both hashes and arrays, the char * holds the pointer to the sparse array 
>DS> vector or something. Sounds like a good candidate for Implementation 
>DS> Defined Data...
>
>Sounds like one of the vtbl entries would be dump_self
>
>Hmm, will vtbl get rid of all the magic hacks?

The "mg.c" 'magic hacks' are in essence applying vtable semantics (they 
are even called vtables in the sources) to a subset of "values".
So yes vtables mean evrything is "magic" so nothing needs "special magic"...


>
><chaim>
-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons