Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc.

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

DS> I was thinking of that--the int portion has the number of keys/entries for 
DS> both hashes and arrays, the char * holds the pointer to the sparse array 
DS> vector or something. Sounds like a good candidate for Implementation 
DS> Defined Data...

Sounds like one of the vtbl entries would be dump_self

Hmm, will vtbl get rid of all the magic hacks?

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183