On 5 Oct 2000, at 15:06, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I should actually RFC it--we could use a "recommended reading" RFC. Have you had any further thoughts on this? Do you think you'll find the tuits necessary? Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I appreciate copies of replies to my messages to Perl6 lists.
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Per... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Cor... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Per... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Philip Newton
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Philip Newton
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have Wel... John van V
