On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:00:12PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2000, at 15:06, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > I should actually RFC it--we could use a "recommended reading" RFC.
>
> Have you had any further thoughts on this? Do you think you'll find
> the tuits necessary?
Well, if you want us to all chip in with ideas, here's what I've been reading
recently:
Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools.
Aho, Sethi, Ullman.
Unicode: A Primer
Tony Graham
Modern Compiler Implementation in C
Andrew Appel
Advanced Programming In The Unix Environment
Stevens
--
"Dogs believe they are human. Cats believe they are God."
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Per... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Cor... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Per... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the... Philip Newton
- Perl recommended reading list Philip Newton
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list John Porter
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl recommended reading list Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have Wel... John van V
