Re: Bytecode safety

[Russ Allbery]

Gibbs Tanton <- tgibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:

> I would vote no.  HOWEVER, I would think that the user should have the
> option to turn on checking for malformed bytecode (i.e. Safe mode).  In
> the default case, I think the bytecode should be assumed well formed and
> no extra checking be performed.

Something akin to gcc's --enable-checking strikes me as a really good
idea.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>