On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:57:51AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > No, because the user may have chosen a different value for IV. For Oh, yep, fair enough. That makes sense. > example, I may have chosen 'long long' in Perl 5 but 'long' in Parrot to > be safe (IIRC, we're still having 64-bit issues) Yeah. That needs fixed. :( > Thus, I am very tired, since I'm talking like this. I should go to > sleep. Goodnight. Sleep well. -- "He was a modest, good-humored boy. It was Oxford that made him insufferable."
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty