At 01:37 PM 9/19/2001 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: >On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > At 05:27 PM 9/19/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > > >I think it's more urgent that we think about having the bytecode > written in > > >native IVs rather than 32 bits; that'll help Tru64 and all the other > things > > >with alignment problems. > > > Sure. That's a matter of getting assemble.pl using the right size for the > > chosen IV. Configure.pl probably ought to handle that somewhere. > >Of course it doesn't help that perl doesn't have a pack() flag for IV :-). Definitely a pain. :) We need to figure out the size and use the appropriate thingie. That should be a mild amount of fun... :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens