Dan -- > >Does anyone object to this going in? Can anyone give me info on > >platform compatibility of this? Can we add some check to Configure.pl > >to figure out what we can do? > > I don't have a problem with this.
OK. In it goes. > The time opcode, though, like the print opcode, were really hacks in there > so I could show that *something* was happening in the interpreter, and > figure out how long that took. They were really toss-off opcodes that were > slated to be killed once a real library and real I/O system was functional, > respectively. Agreed. But until we have those glorious libraries, I'm interested in having those things we *do* have be as useful as possible. The patch updates t/test.pasm, too. I'd really like to rename it to t/test1.pasm, though... Regards, -- Gregor _____________________________________________________________________ / perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \ Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/ 8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox West Chester, OH 45069 513-860-3579 fax \_____________________________________________________________________/
