At 05:09 PM 10/15/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> > The time opcode, though, like the print opcode, were really hacks in there
> > so I could show that *something* was happening in the interpreter, and
> > figure out how long that took. They were really toss-off opcodes that were
> > slated to be killed once a real library and real I/O system was
> functional,
> > respectively.
>
>Agreed. But until we have those glorious libraries, I'm interested
>in having those things we *do* have be as useful as possible.
That's fine. I need to get in and start the loadable module code soon.
After threads/interpreters and probably I/O, I think.
>The patch updates t/test.pasm, too. I'd really like to rename it to
>t/test1.pasm, though...
Sure. I thought you already did that, though. The testN.pasm files are
really more assembly twiddlings than anything else--we ought to rename them
to something meaningful and put them in the examples/assembly directory.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
