At 11:13 AM 10/14/2001 -0400, James Mastros wrote:
>Hey all.
>   I've noticed that we don't seem to have the concept of RAM.

We sort of do, if you treat string contents as a buffer of bytes rather 
than characters. Raw memory sort of lives a step below the interpreter at 
the moment, though I can see uses for that not being the case.

>I see how it
>could be emulated fairly easily, by creating a pad with one-byte PMCs,
>though PMCs have to have string registers as their names, rather then
>numbers.  Is this a feature (IE PMCs names have to have names that are valid
>identifiers), or an oversight?

I have no idea what you're talking about here, unfortunately. Could you 
elaborate some?

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to