On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Ummm. Well. I think that you'll find this pretty much the case already (or
> planned, at least, as some of the bits aren't done yet) so I'm not sure
> that it'd really buy anything other than slower C code.
Wooho!
> Which isn't to say we can't expose the utility library we build to provide
> cross-platform portability, but that's a separate issue.
Hm. That's nearly as good. Does it look like it's going to be possible,
and relitativly painless, to call methods on PMCs from C/C++ code?
I'm going to stop cluttering the list with my GCC port stuff now. (Though
I am going to look at things with an eye towards it, which is one of the
reasons I suggested putting chr and ord in as core opcodes. (And it
really is an inner-loop thing, and completly expressable without any PMCs
with a minimum of fuss.)
-=- James Mastros
--
Put bin Laden out like a bad cigar: http://www.fieler.com/terror
"You know what happens when you bomb Afghanastan? Thats right, you knock
over the rubble." -=- SLM
