David -- > I noticed that for converting numbers to integers and back there are the > named operators "iton" and "ntoi", but for conversions to and from PMCs the > "set" operator is used. > > Should we make all conversions have their own ops (e.g., pton, ptoi, ...) or > should we push all conversions into the set operator. I vote for implicit > conversions in the "set" operator (i.e., moving iton and ntoi into set > operations)
Back in September I suggested something similar. http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-internals%40perl.org/msg04099.html I still support the idea, but would like Simon / Dan to chime in. Regards, -- Gregor ____________________________________________________________________ / Inspiration >> Innovation >> Excellence (TM) \ Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/ 8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox West Chester, OH 45069 513-860-3579 fax \____________________________________________________________________/ [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]$ ping osama.taliban.af PING osama.taliban.af (68.69.65.68) from 20.1.9.11 : 56 bytes of data. >From 85.83.77.67: Time to live exceeded
