At 09:56 PM 12/29/2001 -1000, David & Lisa Jacobs wrote:
>I noticed that for converting numbers to integers and back there are the
>named operators "iton" and "ntoi", but for conversions to and from PMCs the
>"set" operator is used.
>
>Should we make all conversions have their own ops (e.g., pton, ptoi, ...) or
>should we push all conversions into the set operator. I vote for implicit
>conversions in the "set" operator (i.e., moving iton and ntoi into set
>operations)
set's the better way. set I0, N0 can do the conversion as need be, since
it's a different function than set P0, N0.
I'll update the docs.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
