On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> Melvin Smith:
> # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
> # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
> # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
> # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> # > struct IReg int_reg;
> # > struct NReg num_reg;
> # > struct SReg string_reg;
> # >@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
> # > void *current_package; /* The package
> # we're currently in */
> # > UINTVAL string_count;
> # > UINTVAL pmc_count;
> # >-};
> # >+} Parrot_Interp;
> #
> # Didn't Brent Dax propose something about calling it Parrot?
> # In either case,
> # I prefer the typedef, but I vote for Parrot without the _Interp.
>
> Yup. That's actually in now, but I have to move it out of config.h and
> into interpreter.h.
I think I'd prefer to have it keep the _Interp suffix. We're going to have
chunks of the interface have Parrot_ prefixes for embedders and extenders
and, while we're not obligated to have everything be the same, there's a
limit to how much confusion I'm up to.
Dan
