Dan Sugalski:
# On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
#
# > Melvin Smith:
# > # At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
# > # >Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
# > # >-struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # >+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
# > # > struct IReg int_reg;
# > # > struct NReg num_reg;
# > # > struct SReg string_reg;
# > # >@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
# > # > void *current_package; /* The package
# > # we're currently in */
# > # > UINTVAL string_count;
# > # > UINTVAL pmc_count;
# > # >-};
# > # >+} Parrot_Interp;
# > #
# > # Didn't Brent Dax propose something about calling it Parrot?
# > # In either case,
# > # I prefer the typedef, but I vote for Parrot without the _Interp.
# >
# > Yup. That's actually in now, but I have to move it out of
# config.h and
# > into interpreter.h.
#
# I think I'd prefer to have it keep the _Interp suffix. We're
# going to have
# chunks of the interface have Parrot_ prefixes for embedders
# and extenders
# and, while we're not obligated to have everything be the
# same, there's a
# limit to how much confusion I'm up to.
I was afraid you were gonna say that. :^) I'll put it back in my next
embedding patch.
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parrot Configure pumpking, regex hacker, embedding coder, and all-around
good guy
Check out the Parrot FAQ: http://www.panix.com/~ziggy/parrot.html (no,
it's not mine)
<obra> mmmm. hawt sysadmin chx0rs
<lathos> This is sad. I know of *a* hawt sysamin chx0r.
<obra> I know more than a few.
<lathos> obra: There are two? Are you sure it's not the same one?
