At 04:46 PM 3/23/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: >At 4:41 PM -0500 3/23/02, Melvin Smith wrote: >>At 01:42 PM 3/23/2002 -0800, Brent Dax wrote: >>>and Python--languages where you can redefine the world at any time. JVM >>>and the CLR aren't written in a way that allows for such dynamic >>>behavior, so we're making a third VM that does. >> >>"... and one VM to rule them all...." > >It just won't be Parrot--I think the JVM will trounce us handily executing >Java bytecode. (Though I've Guy Steele's e-mail address to gloat at if it >turns out otherwise... :)
It should, its had almost a decade head start. I have no delusions, but it also won't be the JVM in my opinion. :) -Melvin
