Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > the latest changes of HASH in src/hash.c makes t/src/hash.t fail > badly.
Oops, sorry (but at least it isn't the only broken test currently :) > But I still have one problem: hash_put and hash_get are not > symmetric. hash_put puts a void *value, but hash_get returns a > HASHBUCKET. This looks wrong to me. When returning the value directly, we couldn't have NULL value's - or better NULL values and no entry at all would have the same return result. Additionally the returned bucket has the key inside, which could be useful. > boe leo
