Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An alternative (which may or may not a good one) would be to say that you can never actually store a NULL in a hash
Not good. The Hash (now) may take almost arbitrary key/value pairs. Value can be plain ints ...
Okay, that makes sense then. So is the current implementation incomplete? I ask because it looks like the mark functionality won't yet quite deal with non-PObj values, etc. Also, since key and value are now void*'s, there'll be a problem on platforms where sizeof(void *) != sizeof(other types), right? (In particular, doubles will usually be larger than pointers.)
JEff
