On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Luke Palmer wrote: > Should go something like this: > > .sub _main > .local object Cat > .local object felix > newclass Cat, "Cat" > find_type $I0, "Cat" > felix = new $I0 > # ... > .end
Thanks, but that doesn't work either. :/ The "new" op expects an identifier. It won't take a VAR, IREG, or REG. > But note that objects are unfinished. I ran into a certain problem > when I assumed that attributes could be any type of data; not so -- > they can only be integers (at the moment). I needed object support > right away, so I simulated using a hash. The hash has a "CLASS" key > which holds the class to which it belongs. I then use this to get > the methods. I'm not even trying to get objects working yet. I just need something that'll let me run setprop on it so my generators can make iterator "things" with a .next() attached to them... I was using ParrotObjects and ParrotClasss for a while but now you can't make a new ParrotObject directly either. :/ Incidentally, anyone know why not? In python or javascript it's easy to just create an object of no particular class just to have a place to stick things. foo = object() foo.x = 1 It was working fine in parrot too, but then it went away. :/ Sincerely, Michal J Wallace Sabren Enterprises, Inc. ------------------------------------- contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hosting: http://www.cornerhost.com/ my site: http://www.withoutane.com/ --------------------------------------
