On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> make headerizer is trying to operate on files generated by make. Given > that it's supposed to be updating the header files based on the C > sources, this seems vaguely reasonable, so I would suggest that the > problem is actually that you're not supposed to do things in that > order. But make can fail if headerizer has not done his job before, because an include'd file may be not updated and thus the file that include it fails to compile. This is not theory, is failing now that way. -- Salu2
