On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:21 AM, NotFound <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> make headerizer is trying to operate on files generated by make. Given >> that it's supposed to be updating the header files based on the C >> sources, this seems vaguely reasonable, so I would suggest that the >> problem is actually that you're not supposed to do things in that >> order. > > But make can fail if headerizer has not done his job before, because > an include'd file may be not updated and thus the file that include it > fails to compile. This is not theory, is failing now that way.
headerizer doesn't need the full build. It just needs to have the generated C files created that it's trying to modify. Those files don't need to have been compiled. > -- > Salu2 > -- Will "Coke" Coleda
