On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:20:25 +1100, Jeremy Howard wrote:
>My hope is that we can have a single set of frozen RFCs in a month's time,
>with incompatible or redundant RFCs withdrawn.
>In the end, I trust Larry to make good in-or-out decisions if we give him
>good input.
Personally, I would like to have Larry's fiat *before* trying to iron
out the incompatibilities. It could be that you throw away something
that Larry would approve of, and keep something he doesn't like.
--
Bart.
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing an... Christian Soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexi... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... c . soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Jeremy Howard
