Re: a syntax derived from constant-time hash-based n-dim matrices in perl 5

[David L. Nicol]

Nathan Wiger wrote:

>  I don't think array indices
> are something that we should have to go to such lengths to get. I'd
> rather have a somewhat-confusing ; or , based syntax than the above. If
> anything that's *more* confusing and harder to read.
> 
> -Nate

you're right.  What if they both worked?  They're not mutually incompatible.



-- 
                          David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
          Kansas City Perl Mongers will meet Sept. 20th at 7:00 in
          Westport Flea Market Bar & Grill  http://tipjar.com/kcpm