At 10:01 AM 8/14/00 -0400, Steve Simmons wrote:
> 80 - Builtins should permit try/throw/catch as per Java/fatalpm
> style (Peter Scott).
Almost. It's saying that builtin exceptions should be objects with
specific attributes iff a try/throw/catch mechanism is also approved.
>I'd like to see these throw into a post (possibly including RFC3 (Brust)
>as well), and pulled out a single proposal
I'll keep modifying my RFCs with the great feedback and ideas that are
popping up. If my RFC 63 gets close enough to RFC 88 in this process that
I see no impact from merging them - as seems to be happening - I'll
certainly propose to Tony that we merge them as co-authors. As long as I
think there is an ideological difference, I don't think we benefit from
merging a VW beetle with a SUV and trying to present the result as better
than both.
>IMHO trading six RFCs for two will greatly improve the chance of passing.
As I've said before, I don't think there's a competition here.
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies
