Peter Scott wrote:
>
> I'll keep modifying my RFCs with the great feedback and ideas that
> are popping up. If my RFC 63 gets close enough to RFC 88 in this
> process that I see no impact from merging them - as seems to be
> happening - I'll certainly propose to Tony that we merge them as
> co-authors. As long as I think there is an ideological difference,
> I don't think we benefit from merging a VW beetle with a SUV and
> trying to present the result as better than both.
Agreed. I don't even like SUV's. I drive an MG Midget.
I just want the option to bolt on a small gas-turbine engine ;-)
Oh wait, RFC 88 is the SUV! I know, and I take your point. My
main goal for v2 is simplify the core mechanism as far as I can
while still allowing hooks for the kind of extensibility that can
be useful in some applications. Due to previous commitments, I
estimate it will take me about two weeks.
After that we may find the core 88 is very close to 63, in which
case if Peter doesn't mind the hooks, I'd certainly like to
co-author a omnibus Exceptions RFC.
Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
