> > We could either discuss alternate approaches for RFC1, or I could
> > submit a new RFC for a thread architecture that gives me the
> > performance I want.

> Both are more than welcome.  (If you want alternate approaches or
> counter-arguments to be fully documented, then doing both in an RFC
> would probably be best.  Most commentaries that I'll include in later
> versions of RFC 1 will be, at best, rough summaries.)

I'm going to try to put together an RFC.

If I can make my ideas coherent, then we'll have two proposals to
compare. If I can't make my ideas coherent, then at least I'll
understand why they don't work.


- SWM

Reply via email to