Re: Internal Filename Representations (was Re: Summary of I/O related RFCs)

[Jarkko Hietaniemi]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 02:16:31AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> [cc'ed on internals as FYI]
> 
> > =item 36 (v1): Structured Internal Representation of Filenames
> 
> I think this should be discussed a good amount. I think URIs are cool,
> but too much trouble for simple stuff. I don't want to have to write
> "file:///etc/motd" everytime I want to address a file. Too cumbersome.

The (vague) idea wasn't that "everything shall be an URI".  It was
the other way round: "the representation should be generic enough so
that also URIs could be handled".  In other words: things like
the protocol, the port number, the username, the password, could
be part of a "file spec".

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen