Re: Internal Filename Representations (was Re: Summary of I/O related RFCs)

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "NW" == Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

NW> Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>> 
>> The VMS (and TOPS20) advocates will scream here. Versions are part of
>> the file name. The default is the latest version. But the filesystem
>> automatically versions files.
>> 
>> Hmm, if we support versioning files, will perl have to support emacs
>> versioned files? /foo/bar/bash.c.~356~

NW> I would argue they should write File::Versioning or File::VMS or
NW> File::Emacs to deal with type of thing.

Than so should the DOS and Windows camps. Either we go out of our way
to make as many people happy as possible or we should stick to our
roots on unix.

BUt clearly Larry isn't going that route. We should think about the
problem and see how we can accommodate them.

NW> Is there really that much VMS Perl out there? :-)

Yes. Check the p5p archives. And I believe that our esteemed internals
head honcho is (or was) one of them.

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183