On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 10:37:04AM -0800, Michael Fowler wrote: > I would appreciate you giving me the benefit of the doubt that I'm not > intentially misunderstanding you. intentionally > my $spot isa(Foo); This should be my $spot : isa(Foo). Man, these typos are going to be the death of me. Michael -- Administrator www.shoebox.net Programmer, System Administrator www.gallanttech.com --
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a c... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spo... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Piers Cawley
- RE: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Evan Howarth
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... James Mastros
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a c... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Bart Lateur