> =head1 TITLE > > C<my Dog $spot> should simply assert that > C<(!defined($spot) || $spot-E<gt>isa('Dog'))> > > And let them duke it out. You'd have my support for that...I was intending to release an RFC in the next day or two that is exactly along those lines. Damian
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a c... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spo... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Piers Cawley
- RE: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Evan Howarth
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a const... James Mastros
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a c... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot sh... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should ... Jonathan Scott Duff