On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 11:35:53AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote: > > If you can figure a way out of the dilema I proposed above, I suppose > > this makes sense. > > Easy. Don't let File::Lock::Mac inherit from File::Lock. Have it *delegate* > to File::Lock instead. See my forthcoming C<use delegation> RFC. I await with baited breath. Until then, I'll sit on my hands re this RFC. -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just Another Stupid Consultant Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse gleam comes to my eyes as I combine pure water and triticale. -- mjd
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hie... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Mike Lambert
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to in... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... Mike Lambert
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... John Tobey