> Damian, I think it would be worth at least mentioning BLESS and REBLESS > in an "Alternative Names" section in the RFC. Enough people have voiced > concerns over this that I think these two are worth putting in there. As I mentioned in another message, I'll be doing that. > Then Larry can make the call. As always. Damian
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to in... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hie... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hie... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarc... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initial... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to in... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical cal... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls t... Nathan Wiger