Perl has always excelled at convenience. Look at this code: while (<>) { for (split) { s/foo/bar/g; next if /glarch/i; tr/aeiou/eioua/s; print; } } There is *nothing*wrong* with any of them, and to suggest breaking them is extremely demoralizing. Don't you people have anything that's *broken* to fix? Sheesh. I fully expect to see an RFC for each and every lovely Perlism that isn't in C, Python, and Java. Well, Perl *isn't* C, Python, or Java, and there's no need to freak out just because of this!! --tom
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr//... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr//... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Bart Lateur