Tom Christiansen wrote: > > There is *nothing*wrong* with any of them, and to suggest breaking > them is extremely demoralizing. Agreed. 100%. But wait for the RFC, I think you'll find you might actually like it. It doesn't break *any* of Perl 5's regex expressions. Not one. And it adds a whole bunch of neat stuff. -Nate
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr//... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr//... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 165: Allow variables in a tr/// Tom Christiansen